in the time remaining, to help us understand how the man-made system of capitalism will lead to the extinction of our human species, and so many others.
We’ve lived so long under the spell of hierarchy—from god-kings to feudal lords to party bosses—that only recently have we awakened to see not only that “regular” citizens have the capacity for self-governance, but that without their engagement our huge global crises cannot be addressed. The changes needed for human society simply to survive, let alone thrive, are so profound that the only way we will move toward them is if we ourselves, regular citizens, feel meaningful ownership of solutions through direct engagement. Our problems are too big, interrelated, and pervasive to yield to directives from on high.
—Frances Moore Lappé, excerpt from Time for Progressives to Grow Up
Tuesday, November 20, 2012
Naomi Klein on the Link Between Climate Change and Capitalism
I only post this video featuring Klein's views to illustrate how some people can use radical rhetoric to disguise a liberal critique which then suggests only very limited and futile forms of activism. I think that it is an attempt to co-opt radical thinking and to steer it into safer, reformist channels of thought that do not threaten the system of capitalism. Hence, the headline.
But, once one gets into the meat of her comments, clues start appearing that give away her liberal position. For example, at one point in the interview she said “one of the things about deregulated capitalism is that it is a crisis-creation machine." (my emphasis) Then, in the interview she goes on to target the "fossil fuel industry" as the problem. She continues to give her liberal position away when she explains that she wants to restore government regulation and control of capitalist operations. She ignores the fact that the government is sponsored by capitalists and must serve their interests. In other words, she expects the foxes to guard the hen-house of the economy in a sustainable way. And, her activist project of choice is to put pressure on universities to withdraw their investments in fossil fuel corporations.
It is precisely this liberal critical strategy that permits her to have access to the quasi-governmental TV program of PBS.
While liberals such as Klein and Chris Hedges, online websites like TruthDig, publications like The Nation all perform a service by taking issue with the many crises of capitalism, they also perform a service to the One Percent beneficiaries of capitalism by steering all criticism away from a fundamental critique of the system, and by favoring solutions that do not threaten the system.