Swanson provides an assessment of the recent MSNBC's special program entitled Hubris. After providing evidence that the word hubris is incorrect, that it was really about "greed, lust for power, and sadistic vengeance", he concludes by welcoming such programs because they...
...prolong Americans' awareness of the lies that destroyed Iraq are the best hope Iran has right now. MSNBC should be contacted and applauded for airing this and urged to follow up on it.I simply cannot go along with him on that. MSNBC is doing its job as a major propaganda outlet for the Empire's directors. They are doing damage control for the Empire's lies. Everyone knows that the US government's information that led up to the destruction of Iraq was incorrect, but how should the public interpret that? Was it incompetence? Was it due to arrogance? Or, was it a gross war crime of the highest magnitude? It was NSNBC'S task to insure that the public interpreted these war crimes as simply hubris. According to the dictionary that word means:
1. pride or arroganceBy framing the Empire's war crimes this way, the public is encouraged to see the lying as excusable human errors due to human weaknesses. We should applaud that?
2. an excess of ambition, pride, etc, ultimately causing the transgressor's ruin
It's only on obscure US radio stations that you might hear a candid interpretation of the Empire's actions as war crimes. See this.