Surviving Capitalism (Not) : HEAD of the FBI’s Anthrax Investigation Says the Whole Thing Was a SHAM

We’ve lived so long under the spell of hierarchy—from god-kings to feudal lords to party bosses—that only recently have we awakened to see not only that “regular” citizens have the capacity for self-governance, but that without their engagement our huge global crises cannot be addressed. The changes needed for human society simply to survive, let alone thrive, are so profound that the only way we will move toward them is if we ourselves, regular citizens, feel meaningful ownership of solutions through direct engagement. Our problems are too big, interrelated, and pervasive to yield to directives from on high.
—Frances Moore Lappé, excerpt from Time for Progressives to Grow Up

Saturday, April 18, 2015

HEAD of the FBI’s Anthrax Investigation Says the Whole Thing Was a SHAM

Click here to access article from Washington's Blog.

This is the latest article which casts considerable doubt about the FBI investigation into the anthrax attacks following the 9/11 event. It was my suspicion at the time that these anthrax attack were a part of the effort by hidden operatives to reinforce the widespread fear of terrorism following 9/11. The FBI reports of their investigation seemed wildly inconsistent with any objective investigation. Then under pressure to come up with some findings, they engaged in an ongoing public campaign to point an accusing finger at one person, Bruce Ivans, who later died from an apparent suicide. No autopsy was permitted to determine the cause.

In this article the blogger quotes from a lawsuit document filed by the former head of the FBI investigation, Richard Lambert, detailing his charges that the investigation was obstructed from beginning to end. The blogger also cites numerous examples of evidence that is already in the public record which strongly indicates that Ivans was innocent and other material that supports my hunch at the time that the anthrax attacks were a part of the false-flag 9/11 event to instill fear in the American people that they were under siege from Muslim terrorists; and thus would likely accept without question the first Patriot Act, other police state measures, and support foreign military invasions of countries in the Middle East.